Strengthen Your Capital Strategy with External Commercial Borrowings in India 

Foreign companies planning to invest in India need sufficient capital and financing to invest and grow. According to the DEA’s latest external debt report, outstanding foreign debt stood at 736.3 billion USD in March 2025, highlighting the trend of companies turning to their foreign counterparts for their India projects.  

ECB as a concept, while a very local term, offers an avenue for foreign businesses in India to gain the much-needed funding to require to setup their business ventures. While this may be a new term for foreign business owners, at its core, it implies borrowing or sourcing capital from parent company jurisdictions.  

This framework, governed by the RBI and the Department of Economic Affairs, helps overseas investors support Indian operations in a targeted, compliant and capital efficient manner. Understanding the regulatory modalities, the types of eligible borrowers and lenders, the end-use restrictions, maturity norms and approval routes is essential for foreign companies considering Indian operations. 

What is the ECB Policy Framework in 2025? 

Regulatory Architecture and Recent Developments 

The ECB regime in India is principally governed by the RBI under the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) regulations, in coordination with the Department of Economic Affairs (DEA) of the Ministry of Finance. The RBI’s database (“Database on Indian Economy”, DBIE) hosts external debt and ECB-related data. The DEA releases quarterly reports on India’s external debt, which include data relevant to ECBs.  

Recent government statements emphasise that the ECB policy is subject to regular review in consultation with the RBI to reflect evolving macro-economic conditions, global interest rate environments and sectoral needs.  

Key regulatory features as of 2025 include: 

• Borrowing Limits and Structure: The regime now allows eligible Indian borrowers to raise ECB up to certain multiples of net worth, subject to either a fixed cap (e.g., 1 billion USD) or a percentage of net worth threshold, whichever is higher. This replaces older uniform caps and allows the credit-worthy companies’ larger access. (Note: While the specific “300 % of net worth or 1 billion USD whichever is higher” cap is a forward-looking example, government releases emphasise enhanced flexibility without always giving exact multiples). 

• Eligibility Expansion: The definition of eligible borrowers has been expanded to include non-bank financial companies, infrastructure investment trusts and real-estate investment trusts besides traditional corporates. The list of recognised lenders has been broadened to include foreign banks, financial institutions and certain foreign equity holders in Indian companies. 

• End-use Flexibility and Restrictions: While ECB proceeds remain restricted for certain uses such as investment in real estate, capital market investment and equity participation, there has been greater liberalisation for uses such as capital expenditure, refinancing of existing loans and working capital tied to identifiable projects. The DEA press release confirms continued restrictions but emphasises enhanced scope for permissible end-uses. 

• Maturity Requirements:  

The table highlights the eligible ECB limits, corresponding maturity periods, and related conditions for different borrower categories. 

*Note: The specific guidelines and exceptions can be subject to change. It is advisable to refer to the latest official circulars from the RBI for the most current information* 

• Approval Routes: The majority of ECB transactions fall under the “automatic route” (i.e., no prior RBI approval required) provided they meet prescribed conditions. The “approval route” is required for cases that fall outside the automatic route conditions (e.g., larger amounts, non-standard end-use, shorter maturities). Government disclosures refer to this bifurcation in the ECB policy review documents.  

Policy Objectives 

The regulatory framework is designed to: 

• Enable Indian borrowers to access global capital at competitive rates, thereby facilitating large-scale infrastructure and manufacturing investment. 

• Align the borrowing volume and cost to the financial strength of the borrower, thereby promoting prudent debt management. 

• Mitigate currency-risk exposure by requiring hedging for shorter maturities or high-volatility end-uses. 

• Enhance transparency and reporting so that ECB flows are monitored and incorporated into India’s external debt statistics (compiled by DEA). 

Data Insights: ECB Volumes, Sectors, and Pricing (2025) 

Aggregate and Sectoral Trends 

According to the DEA’s “India’s External Debt: A Status Report 2023-24”, the outstanding stock of ECB (non-government) in India was reported as 190.4 billion USD as of September 2024. This figure is also repeated in other government-approved sources. 

New filings/registrations for ECB show significant momentum: the RBI data (via secondary sources) indicates that in FY25 Indian firms filed ECB proposals aggregating 61.18 billion USD, up from 48.81 billion USD in FY24 and 25.98 billion USD in FY23. Within that, March 2025 saw filings of 11.04 billion USD (a 72-month high).  

Sector-wise pattern (while detailed government-publisher breakdown by borrower type is limited) suggests manufacturing and infrastructure sectors were major users. For example, in March 2025 a large portion of ECB filings were for refinancing earlier borrowings by heavy industry/steel companies. (As per RBI/Business Standard summary)  

Other important statistics: 

• Private sector companies hold around 63 % of outstanding ECB stock (as per an SBI research summary citing RBI data). 

• According to the DEA’s external debt report, corporate external debt (of which ECB is a major component) is a significant portion of India’s overall external debt stock, which includes sovereign and non-sovereign borrowings. 
   

Pricing and Borrowing Costs 

While the exact all-in-cost ceilings have been liberalised, the government/policy documents reflect that earlier regimes had all-in-cost ceilings pegged at various spreads over six-month LIBOR (or equivalent) for given maturities. For example, the 2008 review noted: three to five years maturity – 200 basis points, more than five up to seven years – 350 basis points, and more than seven years – 450 basis points.  

Recent commentary (based on RBI bulletins and industry sources) indicates that average spreads in 2025 are around 170 basis points over benchmark, reflecting improved access. 

End-use and Sectoral Use Patterns 

In India, ECBs are primarily meant for productive uses such as project expansion, import of capital goods, and infrastructure development, while areas like real estate and capital markets remain off-limits unless clearly approved by the RBI. 

The infrastructure sector benefits from more relaxed conditions. The DEA’s 2008 review expanded the annual ceiling for rupee-capital expenditure through ECBs under the approval route to 500 million USD from the earlier 100 million USD, paving the way for greater participation from sectors such as power generation, renewables, logistics, ports, and large-scale manufacturing. 

Participation by Foreign Companies 

Foreign multinational companies typically participate in the Indian ECB market via their Indian subsidiaries or joint ventures. For them, major incentives include: 

• Ability to raise debt that is offshore (thus potentially lower cost) without additional equity issuance. 

• Alignment of borrowings with the Indian entity’s project cash flows and balance sheet, while the foreign parent or lender remains at arm’s length. 

• A regulatory environment that now offers faster automatic‐route approvals, enabling more responsive financing. While government sources do not publish detailed numbers of foreign-company participation, the survey commentary and industry disclosures indicate increasing usage by MNCs in automotive, renewables and fintech. 

For foreign companies designing an India strategy, key considerations include aligning the ECB borrowing to the Indian entity’s net worth and credit profile, ensuring end-use compliance and hedging exposures, and integrating the ECB into a broader financing mix (including FDI, domestic debt and local currency financing). 

Government Initiatives and Supervisory Safeguards 

The Indian government and regulators maintain robust safeguards and oversight around ECB flows: 

• The DEA’s regular review of the ECB policy ensures the mode, magnitude and end-use of external commercial borrowings remain aligned to macro-financial stability. 

• Hedging norms: Although not always published in granular detail, many infrastructure and NBFC-entities raising shorter-maturity ECBs are required to hedge 100 % of the foreign‐currency exposure, especially where maturity is less than five years. Industry commentary confirms this as part of the supervisory approach. 

• Enhanced transparency: The RBI and DEA publish quarterly and annual external-debt reports that include the corporate debt component. For example, the DEA’s “India’s External Debt: A Status Report 2023-24” is publicly available. 

• Sectoral support: The infrastructure sector obtains special dispensations, such as enhanced allowable amounts for rupee-capital expenditure via ECB (as per earlier review). While this particular review dates back to 2008, it underpins the current structure of preferential sectoral access. 

Practical Considerations for Foreign Companies 

When foreign companies evaluate using ECBs within India, the following considerations are critical: 

• Project-timing and currency risk alignment: Ensure that the borrowing period, currency type and repayment plan are aligned with the Indian entity’s cash flows and project timeline. For example, if a manufacturing plant will begin production two years later, the ECB withdrawal and repayment plan should reflect that. Hedging measures must be in place to manage foreign exchange risk. 

• Documentation, compliance and approval routes: Confirm eligibility of borrower (Indian subsidiary or joint venture), recognised lender status, end-use compliance, average maturity requirement, reporting to RBI, and whether the borrowing qualifies for automatic route. Non-standard borrowings may require the approval route, which is more time-consuming. The DEA note emphasises that deviations require RBI notification. 

• Integrated capital-structure strategy: Foreign companies may use FDI to establish ownership and control, and alongside that use ECB for debt-financing. Combining equity and debt financing allows leveraging, maintains ownership levels, and can optimise cost of capital. The comparative table later in this guide clarifies FDI vs ECB dynamics. 

• Sectoral focus and preferential norms: Sectors such as infrastructure, renewable energy, heavy manufacturing, logistics and select fintech have favourable ECB access norms. Foreign companies operating in those sectors may find ECBs especially attractive. 

• Credit-strength assessment: Since the new regime ties limits to borrower net worth or credit profile, foreign companies should ensure that their Indian entity’s financials are solid, compliance transparent, and reporting timely to secure favourable borrowing terms. 

• Use of funds and refinancing strategy: Many Indian companies use ECBs not only for new capex but also to refinance existing external debt or replace domestic higher-cost debt. Foreign-invested entities should assess whether they are using ECB for genuine expansion or for rollover/refinancing, as this may influence eligibility and cost. (Industry commentary shows significant recent use of ECB for refinancing). 

Comparative Analysis: FDI vs ECB in India 

From a strategic perspective, foreign companies often deploy FDI initially to secure a presence and control in India and subsequently adopt ECB for large-scale expansion without further equity dilution. The hybrid approach enables efficient capital structuring. 

What are the Recent Policy and Market Trends? 

• In September 2025, the policy norm for the infrastructure sector under the approval route was enhanced to 500 million USD per year, with longer minimum maturity for larger amounts. Government reviews confirm this cap for rupee-capital expenditure-type ECBs in infrastructure. 

• The “India’s External Debt: A Status Report 2023-24” shows that while the sovereign external debt segment is moderate, the non-government external debt (which mainly comprises corporate ECBs) is a growing share of total external debt. 

• According to industry commentary based on RBI data, companies faced principal repayments of 25.8 billion USD in ECBs between April 2024 and February (covering part of FY25) indicating that many new borrows were effectively refinancing earlier debt or rollover rather than fresh investment. 

• The upward trend in ECB filings (61.18 billion USD in FY25 vs 48.81 billion USD in FY24) underscores rising reliance on external commercial borrowings by Indian corporates and signifies stronger confidence in India’s project pipeline and cross-border funding willingness. 

ECBs as a Strategic Lever for Foreign Business Success in India 

The external commercial borrowings framework in India has matured into a sophisticated, transparent, and dynamic channel of foreign-currency debt for eligible Indian entities. Driven by enhancements in eligibility, flexible borrowing norms, streamlined approvals and greater alignment to borrower strength, ECB in India offers foreign companies a viable route to support Indian subsidiaries or joint ventures via debt financing rather than equity alone. 

For foreign investors evaluating the Indian growth story, using ECB alongside FDI and domestic funding enables a balanced capital structure, optimised cost of capital, and improved financial flexibility. Sectoral priorities, regulatory clarity and macro-economic stability make India a favourable environment for leveraging ECB in the context of manufacturing, infrastructure, renewables, logistics and large-scale expansion. 

Nevertheless, prudent risk management remains essential. Foreign companies must focus on currency and interest-rate risk, ensure regulatory compliance (eligibility, end-use, maturity norms), align borrowings to project timelines, and integrate these borrowings into an overall capital-strategy framework. 

For foreign companies seeking access to India’s growth opportunities, external commercial borrowings form a credible strategic lever, provided they are used thoughtfully, compliantly and in concert with broader financing and business objectives.