For Foreign Companies
For Indian Companies
GIFT City
Taxation Services
Advisory & Regulatory
Accounting Services
For a US startup entering India, growth does not fail at the market level. It stalls at the structural level. India offers multiple legal entity structures for foreign businesses, but US startups most often narrow their decision to a Branch Office or a Wholly Owned Subsidiary. One keeps operations narrow and controlled. The other unlocks broader business freedom but with deeper regulatory responsibility. Many founders step in cautiously, aiming to test the waters, only to find their entry model limiting how they sell, invoice or operate within months.
What begins as a legal formality soon becomes a business constraint or a competitive advantage. Market entry strategy that felt safe at entry can feel restrictive within a year. A model that required more effort at the outset may end up saving time and cost in operations. Understanding how these two routes differ in liability, taxation and control help founders avoid the frustration of restructuring later.
US startups working on their market entry strategy into India must work within a defined regulatory framework. Requirements may differ depending on whether they choose a Branch Office or a Wholly Owned Subsidiary in India. Recent updates in 2025 aims to simplify process, strengthen disclosure standards, and create a clear expectation for compliance. Understanding these compliances at the outstep helps companies choose the structure that aligns best with their operational plans.
When deciding between a Branch Office or a Wholly Owned Subsidiary in India, Taxation becomes a critical factor. Branch offices are treated as a non-resident entity and are taxed on income arising or received in India, often at higher rates. Wholly Owned Subsidiary, as domestic companies, benefit from lower corporate tax rates and has access to various incentives which make them more tax efficient for long term operations. Let’s look at the table highlighting the key differences in detail:
| Taxation Aspect | Branch Office (BO) | Wholly Owned Subsidiary (WOS) |
|---|---|---|
| Corporate Tax Rate | Effective rate up to 38.22 percent, including surcharge and cess. | Companies can opt for 22 percent under Section 115BAA, with an effective rate of approximately 25.17 percent. |
| Income Tax Scope | Tax is levied only on income accruing or received in India. | Taxed as a domestic company on operations conducted in India. |
| Profit Repatriation | Profits can be remitted to the parent company under FEMA regulations. | Dividends can be repatriated under the U.S.-India tax treaty, minimizing double taxation. |
| Transfer Pricing Compliance | Transactions with related parties must comply with Indian transfer pricing rules. | Similar transfer pricing compliance is required for related-party transactions within India. |
| Tax Incentives | Limited access to local tax incentives. | Eligible for sector- and state-specific deductions and incentives to reduce operational costs. |
This table shows that while a Branch Office faces higher taxation and limited incentives, a Wholly Owned Subsidiary provides better tax efficiency and planning opportunities for US startups seeking a long-term presence in India.
When a foreign company is considers entering the Indian market, understanding differences in liability, governance, and regulatory requirements becomes crucial. BO operates as an extension of the parent company, subjecting it to full liability but with simpler governance. WOS is a separate legal entity, limiting the parent’s liability while requiring stricter corporate governance and transparency. The table below summarises these differences:
| Feature | Branch Office (BO) | Wholly Owned Subsidiary (WOS) |
|---|---|---|
| Liability | Unlimited: The parent company bears full liability for the BO’s obligations | Limited: The parent’s risk is limited to the investment in the WOS |
| Governance | Simplified: No local board is required, reducing administrative overhead | Corporate Governance: Must comply with Indian company law, including board meetings, audits, and filings |
| Regulatory Oversight / Transparency | RBI oversight ensures compliance with financial and operational rules | Enhanced CRL-1 rules require clear disclosure of ownership and control |
U.S startups must carefully evaluate the trade-offs between establishing a BO or WOS when working on their market entry strategy. Each option has distinct implications for market entry, regulatory compliance, taxation, risk exposure, and exit flexibility. Let’s look at some of the key considerations that can provide a clear comparison to support informed decision making:
| Category | Branch Office | Wholly Owned Subsidiary |
|---|---|---|
| Market Entry vs Long-Term Presence | Suitable for testing services, R&D, or consultancy operations without large commitments. | Ideal for long-term operations, local hiring, and full business control. |
| Regulatory Compliance | Easier establishment with the 2025 draft regulations, though ongoing reporting remains mandatory. | Full compliance required under CRL-1 and Indian corporate law, increasing administrative responsibilities. |
| Tax Optimisation | Higher taxes on Indian income; repatriation requires compliance with remittance rules. | Lower domestic tax rates, eligibility for incentives, and strategic planning for repatriation. |
| Exposure and Risk Containment | Parent fully liable; limited structural separation. | Legal and financial liabilities contained within the subsidiary, though governance requires more effort. |
| Exit Flexibility | Easier closure through bank and RBI procedures. | Closure involves formal winding-up, but the entity can also be sold or merged. |
The structured comparison above highlights how a BO offers speed and simplicity for exploratory operations. A WOS provides stronger legal protection, tax efficiency, and long-term operational flexibility. The choice ultimately depends on the startup’s strategic priorities and the intended scale of operations in India
Government of India has introduced several reforms in 2025 that are important for foreign companies to understand. These reforms can impact the decision of foreign companies to choose between a Branch Office or a Wholly Owned Subsidiary in India. These changes aim to simplify compliance, increase transparency, and provided incentives for business operations.
The RBI Draft Regulations for Branch Offices introduced in 2025 aim to make the process of entering India more structured and business friendly. The emphasis has shifted toward evaluating businesses on financial strength and compliance history rather than overly procedural criteria. As a result, foreign companies face fewer administrative barriers during setup. The new approach has also simplified annual reporting and documentation responsibilities. This allows management teams to focus more on business development, partnerships, and market presence rather than spending disproportionate time on regulatory administration.
The revised CRL-1 Filing Requirements for Subsidiaries places greater importance on corporate transparency and accuracy in ownership disclosure. From July 2025, companies must clearly document their group structures and ownership arrangements. This encourages responsible corporate governance and strengthens investor trust. Foreign companies are advised to invest in strong internal reporting systems to ensure consistent and accurate submissions. While the compliance process is more detailed, it creates a cleaner and more credible regulatory environment.
Tax Regime Stability continues to be one of India’s strongest advantages for foreign businesses. Companies benefit from a stable policy environment that allows for long-term financial planning. Concessional tax rates available under existing provisions make India an attractive jurisdiction for sustained investment and expansion.
Across the country, state governments are playing an increasingly active role in attracting foreign investment by offering structured support programs that go well beyond tax benefits alone. Companies can access capital subsidies, reduced land and registration expenses, electricity concessions, and financial assistance for employee training. Many states also reward job creation through wage support initiatives and employment incentives. For companies in technology and innovation-driven sectors, states offer dedicated benefits for research activities and digital infrastructure. Manufacturing-centric regions focus on supply chain facilities, industrial parks, and transportation connectivity. Most states now operate investor support cells and digital clearance platforms to simplify approvals and reduce wait times. These State-Level Incentives often make a meaningful difference in how smoothly a company establishes its operations.
The decision to set up a branch office or incorporate a wholly owned subsidiary is one of the earliest choices a US startup should make when planning to move in India. The structure determines how much control you retain, how compliance is managed, and how easily profits move across borders. A clear market entry strategy brings direction to this decision instead of leaving it to convenience.
When the groundwork is done thoughtfully, execution becomes smoother and future expansion less disruptive. Instead of revisiting structural decisions later, founders can focus on building teams, serving customers, and growing with confidence in one of the world’s most competitive markets.
