- Business Setup
For Foreign Companies
For Indian Companies
GIFT City
- GCC Setup
- Corporate Services
Taxation Services
Advisory & Regulatory
Accounting Services
- Who We Are
- Contact Us
For Foreign Companies
For Indian Companies
GIFT City
Taxation Services
Advisory & Regulatory
Accounting Services
India has established itself as one of the most preferred investment destinations in the world. Global business delegations, high-profile investment summits, and long-term strategic partnerships all point in the same direction: international confidence in India is growing. FDI inflows into India crossed USD 88 billion in eleven months of the last fiscal year, surpassing the figures recorded in the previous year, as per DPIIT reports.
This is not just a statistical milestone. It reflects a shift in how the world views India’s economic potential. What makes this story more interesting is – who is behind the scenes. While major economies like the USA and the European Union tend to dominate the conversation around global investment, Asian economies like Singapore and Japan have quietly emerged as some of the top countries investing in India.
This blog takes a closer look at the key countries that have shaped India’s FDI journey and the market trends that are defining where this investment is headed next.
Five economies account for the bulk of equity-mode FDI inflows in India: Singapore, USA, Mauritius, Japan, and the UAE. According to DPIIT’s quarterly complications, together they contribute over 75% of total FDI equity inflows during April-December 2025-26.
| Rank | Country | FDI Equity Inflow (Apr-Dec FY26) | Approx. INR (INR crore) | Share (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Singapore | USD 17.65 billion | INR 1,41,200 crore | 37% |
| 2 | United States | USD 7.81 billion | INR 62,500 crore | 16% |
| 3 | Mauritius | USD 4.83 billion | INR 38,600 crore | 10% |
| 4 | Japan | USD 3.20 billion | INR 25,600 crore | 7% |
| 5 | UAE | USD 2.45 billion | INR 19,600 crore | 5% |
Source: DPIIT FDI Fact Sheet, FY2025-26 (April-December 2025)
The country holds the top position by a considerable margin, channelling over INR 1,41,200 crores during the first nine months of FY26. Singapore-linked capital typically flows through fund managed vehicles, regional holding structures, and treasury-style investment platforms. It’s treaty framework with India, English-language contracts norms, and common-law aligned legal environment make it a familiar and regulatorily predictable conduit, particularly for entities that need to consolidate Asia-Pacific holdings under a single jurisdiction.
As per DPIIT, during Q1 of FY2025-26, alone, US investors deployed USD 5.61 billion which is nearly triple the USD 1.50 billion record in the same quarter of the previous year. US-linked FDI is increasingly concentrated in technology-intensive sectors: computer software, digital services, fintech infrastructure, and advanced manufacturing. These flows are characterised by long-horizon corporate investment and venture-backed minority stakes in scaling India-origin companies, typically structured through the automatic route.
The country remains relevant primarily for fund-driven and portfolio style investments, particularly where treaty characteristics and cost-efficient establishments are prioritised. While regulatory tightening has reduced some advantages in recent years, Mauritius registered structure continues to feature in cross-border investment arrangements that require rapid development.
Japan contributes through long-term corporate strategic investment, typically via joint ventures in capital-intensive sectors. Japanese-sourced FDI is concentrated in automobiles, electrical equipment, and prevision manufacturing, aligning with India’s production-linked incentives (PIL) schemes and the broader “make in India” push.
The UAE has emerged as a fast-rising economy in the middle east. UAE-lined inflows are increasingly directed towards logistics, real estate adjacent infrastructure, energy services, and industrial-corridor projects, reflecting both the UAE’s own diversification agenda and India’s push to modernise its freight and industrial infrastructure.
Look at two decades of FDI equity data and a pattern becomes hard to ignore. Services and technology have absorbed the largest share of foreign capital coming into India, each at 16% of cumulative inflows through December 2025, per DPIIT. Services at INR 8,39,105 crore, computer software and hardware at INR 8,77,697 crore. Trading and telecom have contributed steadily too, at 7% and 5% respectively, but the tech and services pull have been something else entirely.
FY 2025-26 sharpened that picture further. IT-related equity inflows doubled in H1 compared to the year before. In Q1 alone, computer software and hardware drew INR 45,000 crore. For a technology, fintech, or digital services business in India still weighing India’s role in its global structure, that number is a signal worth sitting with. The co-investor base is there. The development ecosystem is there. The exit-oriented capital is there. India is not a market these investors are exploring anymore.
For manufacturing-oriented investors, the landscape is equally structured. Key sectors with significant FDI traction include:
The PLI scheme threads through most of this. INR 1,97,000 crore in approved incentives across sectors has given manufacturers a concrete financial reason to choose India, not just a strategic one.
Most foreign businesses default to Maharashtra or Karnataka. There are good reasons for that. But the decision deserves more scrutiny than it usually gets.
Cumulative FDI equity inflows from April 2000 to December 2025, per DPIIT:
Q1 FY 2025-26 saw Karnataka lead on fresh inflows, ahead of Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu. Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh have each worked to close the gap, through targeted policy changes, infrastructure upgrades, and faster clearance systems. The data from recent quarters supports it. This makes Karnataka one of the strongest examples of business opportunities in India- Karnataka, particularly for foreign companies looking at technology, manufacturing, and services-led expansion.
Two broad paths exist for a foreign business working through this call. The established metros offer something specific: deep talent, regulatory familiarity, and a professional services layer that absorbs a lot of the early complexity. Bengaluru, Mumbai, Chennai have handled enough foreign entry that the process is relatively predictable. For many foreign investors, company registration in Mumbai remains a practical choice because of the city’s mature advisory ecosystem, financial infrastructure, and familiarity with cross-border business setup. The newer destinations offer a different argument. SEZ-linked incentives, subsidies structured around particular sectors, single-window systems that have improved enough to matter. For businesses where cost efficiency or manufacturing is central to the model, those advantages are worth stress-testing against the conventional choices.
India’s FDI trajectory is not the result of a single policy push. It has been shaped by a series of deliberate liberalisation moves over several years, gradually opening more sectors under the automatic route and reducing the approvals burden on foreign investors. The Consolidated FDI Policy, maintained by DPIIT, reflects this: the list of sectors that still require government clearance is short, and it has been getting shorter.
Recent reforms that have shifted how foreign investors approach entry:
The government’s Business Reform Action Plan (BRAP), now in its eighth edition (BRAP 2026, launched November 2025), continues to assess and improve state-level ease of doing business. The Project Monitoring Group (PMG) under DPIIT operates as a facilitation mechanism for projects above INR 500 crore, providing milestone-based oversight and bottleneck resolution, a meaningful support structure for large-scale foreign-invested projects.
India’s GII ranking adds context that often gets overlooked in these conversations. 38th among 139 economies in 2025, up from 81st in 2015. Research infrastructure, IP protection, institutional quality, these have all improved in ways that are documented and ranked. For technology-focused investors especially, that kind of systemic progress carries weight that sits alongside but separate from the policy reforms.
The gross inflow number gets most of the attention. But net FDI is arguably more useful, because it accounts for what leaves. April to February FY26 saw net inflows reach INR 51,900 crore, a sharp jump from roughly INR 7,900 crore in the corresponding period of FY25, per RBI data. Stronger incoming capital played a role. So did a slowdown in repatriation and outward investments.
Foreign subsidiaries operating in India tend to run into the same set of treasury questions at some point. Three of them come up consistently:
For a foreign business planning entry, the most actionable insight is this: India’s FDI ecosystem is no longer concentrated in a small set of intermediaries or a narrow band of sectors. It is increasingly diverse in terms of source countries, sectors, and states, which means a well-structured entry can find genuine competitive ground across multiple sectors.
The top countries investing in India are doing so through long-horizon strategies anchored in governance quality, cost competitiveness, and market scale. The question for any foreign business is no longer whether India fits the investment thesis. It is how to enter in a way that is structurally sound, commercially optimised, and aligned with the policy framework that continues to evolve in investors’ favour.
