- Business Setup
- Corporate Services
Advisory Services
Regulatory Services
Tax Services
Accounting Services
- Insights
- Who We Are
- Contact Us
Advisory Services
Regulatory Services
Tax Services
Accounting Services
Multinational businesses do not usually run into trouble because they ignored a tax law. More often than not, the problem is that they chose a transfer pricing model that did not reflect how their business actually worked. The result is tax authority disputes, costly adjustments, and reputational damage that takes time to reverse.
Since the UAE introduced corporate tax under Federal Decree-Law No. 47 of 2022, transfer pricing rules now carry real legal weight for businesses operating in or through the country. The OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines form the reference framework, and the arm’s length principle is the standard against which every intercompany transaction is measured.
Choosing the right transfer pricing model is not purely a tax decision. It is a business decision, one that must reflect how your company operates, where value is genuinely created, and how risk is shared across your group.
Before selecting any method, you need to understand your business clearly. The OECD guidelines require a functional analysis, an honest assessment of what each entity in your group actually does, what assets it uses, and what risks it carries.
A holding company in Dubai that owns intellectual property, and licenses it to subsidiaries across the GCC operates very differently from a manufacturing entity in Jebel Ali producing goods under contract. The transfer pricing model that suits one will not suit the other.
Three questions matter most at this stage. Who performs the key functions in the group? Who controls and bears the economic risks? And where are the valuable assets including intangibles owned and managed? Once you have clear answers, your shortlist of suitable methods narrows down considerably.
The OECD guidelines, referenced by the UAE Federal Tax Authority, recognise five transfer pricing methods:
| Method | Category | Best Suited For |
|---|---|---|
| Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) | Traditional | Commodity trades, straightforward product sales |
| Resale Price Method (RPM) | Traditional | Distribution and resale operations |
| Cost Plus Method (CPM) | Traditional | Manufacturing, routine service providers |
| Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) | Transactional | Most intercompany arrangements |
| Profit Split Method (PSM) | Transactional | Integrated operations, unique intangibles |
No single method is universally preferred for transfer pricing model in the UAE. The OECD states that the best transfer pricing model is the one that yields the most accurate arm’s length outcome based on the specific facts. Businesses are expected to justify their method selection within their transfer pricing documentation.
These three methods come up most frequently in practice. CUP model compares the price in a controlled transaction to the price in a comparable uncontrolled one. When reliable comparables are available, in commodity trading or certain financial transactions, CUP provides the clearest evidence of arm’s length terms.
The difficulty lies in finding genuinely comparable transactions. Minor differences in product quality, contract terms, or market conditions can weaken the comparison, making CUP hard to apply for most service or IP-driven businesses.
TNMM is the most widely used method globally. It compares the net profit margin of the tested party against comparable independent companies performing similar functions. TNMM works well because it is less sensitive to minor differences between transactions. If your entity performs routine functions, distribution, contract manufacturing, shared services, and you can identify reliable comparables through databases such as Orbis or TP Catalyst, TNMM is typically your most defensible choice.
Profit Split is used when multiple related parties make distinct, significant contributions to a transaction, and assessing each party’s contribution separately is not feasible. This often arises in joint development arrangements, integrated financial operations, or situations where intangibles are developed jointly. It demands more robust economic analysis, but where the facts support it, it is difficult for tax authorities to challenge.
Your industry directly shapes which method holds up under scrutiny. Some examples of these includes:
Financial services firms handling treasury functions and intercompany loans typically rely on CUP, using market interest rates or credit ratings as benchmarks. The OECD’s 2020 guidance on financial transactions, released under BEPS Action 4, introduced tighter standards for intercompany financing arrangements that businesses in this space must now follow.
Technology and IP-driven businesses face the most complex transfer pricing environment. If your UAE entity holds or licenses intangible assets, the profit split method or a CUP based on comparable licence agreements becomes relevant. Finding genuinely comparable licences in public databases is rarely straightforward.
Trading and distribution businesses generally use the resale price method or TNMM, depending on the functions performed and value added by the UAE entity.
Manufacturing and contract service businesses typically find the cost-plus method or TNMM most appropriate, based on how much commercial risk the UAE entity actually carries.
In addition to this, the transaction type matters just as much as the industry. Intercompany loans, management fees, royalties, and physical goods transactions. Each carry different benchmarking standards and attract different levels of regulatory attention.
Under UAE transfer pricing rules, businesses with revenue exceeding AED 200 million; or those that are part of a multinational group with consolidated revenues above AED 3.15 billion; must prepare and maintain a master file and local file in line with OECD BEPS Action 13 standards.
Even for businesses below these thresholds, the Federal Tax Authority expects your transfer pricing policy and method selection to be in place before the financial year ends not put together after an audit notice arrives.
The method you choose must be supported by actual data. TNMM requires a defensible comparables search. The profit split model needs a well-defined allocation key based on commercial reasoning.
Selecting a simpler approach solely to minimise documentation effort. Especially when your facts require a more careful analysis, this introduces a different risk and is unlikely to withstand review.
The right transfer pricing model is not one that looks best on paper. It is the one that accurately reflects your business and can withstand scrutiny from tax authorities on both sides of an intercompany transaction.
Start with a clear functional analysis. Understand your group’s value chain. Match your method to your transaction type and industry. Get your documentation in order before the year closes.
For businesses in the UAE, working with a transfer pricing adviser such as Stratrich Consulting who understands both OECD guidelines and the Federal Tax Authority’s expectations is a practical step. The cost of getting transfer pricing in the UAE right is always less than the cost of getting it wrong.
